Re: Question about the Jackson PS-4...
The PS-2 I have has a thicker, more "Fenderish" neck than my DK-2, which is very thin like an Ibanez neck. I like them both tough. The PS-2 neck has an amber stain which makes it look nice, wheras the DK-2 is unstained and the stark white color reminds me
unfavorably of the cheaper Ibanez RGs.
I would say the current Pro Series comes in quality wise as lower than the Professional Series that existed while the erformers were in production. Not that they're bad at all, they're nice guitars, but other than cosmetics I don't find the DK-2 to be much better than
the PS-2. I think ackson decided to consolidate 2 Japan lines into one of quality
midway betwen the earlier 2. This was to increase the distance between the USA and Japan lines so as not to take sales from the USA lines, and to cut costs by sending the lower lines off to India to be made. That's just my opinion and I have no doubt the official line would deny this, but that's how it seems to me.
The PS-2 I have has a thicker, more "Fenderish" neck than my DK-2, which is very thin like an Ibanez neck. I like them both tough. The PS-2 neck has an amber stain which makes it look nice, wheras the DK-2 is unstained and the stark white color reminds me
unfavorably of the cheaper Ibanez RGs.
I would say the current Pro Series comes in quality wise as lower than the Professional Series that existed while the erformers were in production. Not that they're bad at all, they're nice guitars, but other than cosmetics I don't find the DK-2 to be much better than
the PS-2. I think ackson decided to consolidate 2 Japan lines into one of quality
midway betwen the earlier 2. This was to increase the distance between the USA and Japan lines so as not to take sales from the USA lines, and to cut costs by sending the lower lines off to India to be made. That's just my opinion and I have no doubt the official line would deny this, but that's how it seems to me.
Comment