If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Thanks for the info, Toeman. Reading through the reviews makes me a wee bit negative though. They point out a couple of flaws. Can't help thinking that a Tremsetter would be much smarter, if it fits a vintage trem.
how would that add more sustain than blocking your trem would? There's no sustain block, so you're already shedding mass by installing it. And would the additional contact you'd have by screwing it to the body front-and-back be an improvement over the additional contact you'd achieve by blocking the trem?
ps. the bridge on my Model 1A gives me no trouble at all. I leave the bar off it and have no problem keeping the guitar in tune
how would that add more sustain than blocking your trem would? There's no sustain block, so you're already shedding mass by installing it. And would the additional contact you'd have by screwing it to the body front-and-back be an improvement over the additional contact you'd achieve by blocking the trem?
Don't know. I just thought it was pretty neat looking and had never seen anything like it before. I think some guys on the Fender Forum have it and could probably tell more about it.
I feel my soul go cold... only the dead are smiling.
Don't know. I just thought it was pretty neat looking and had never seen anything like it before. I think some guys on the Fender Forum have it and could probably tell more about it.
I agree, it looks pretty neat. And I have a project that it would work pretty good for, but that body isn't routed for a trem so the bridge would be screwed flat to the top.
I just don't buy all the "advantages" they advertise over a blocked vintage trem.
Comment