Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Help identifying little jackson....

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Help identifying little jackson....

    Hi all. I' trying to identify this guitar. I think it's a USA jackson, don't know which.

    http://digilander.libero.it/nn41/jackson/jackson.htm

    Any hints?
    SN# on the neck-plate is 913047
    thx in advance

  • #2
    Well the neck is from a Japanese Jackson (all "Professional" logoed headstocks are MIJ)

    I'm gonna say the body is a (Charvel) Fusion Special (also Japanese).

    Anything else on the plate besides the #?

    Interesting mutt!
    "Quiet, numbskulls, I'm broadcasting!" -Moe Howard, "Micro-Phonies" (1945)

    Comment


    • #3
      I'm sure the guitar has not been modified during the years. Anyway I don't understand why there's no SN on the headstock.
      Kinda misteriously, isn't it?

      Comment


      • #4
        No, bolt-ons usually have the ser# on the neckplate.

        If you're sure it hasn't been modded then it's probably a Jackson Fusion of some sort.


        Edit: Just saw the neckplate
        Last edited by RacerX; 10-20-2006, 03:29 AM. Reason: I didn't look at all the pics
        "Quiet, numbskulls, I'm broadcasting!" -Moe Howard, "Micro-Phonies" (1945)

        Comment


        • #5
          Looks like a mutt to me. The neck looks like a fusion but it's hard to tell. I like the p/u combination.
          I feel festive all year round. Deal with it.

          Comment


          • #6
            never seen a Jackson Fusion like it. I think Ron may have picked it - Jackson Fusion neck with a Charvel Fusion Special body.
            Hail yesterday

            Comment


            • #7
              That body looks like it could be from one of those cheap Charvels with the 2 single coil sized hums at the bridge, but they only had 22 frets.....

              http://www.audiozone.dk/CatalogScans...ges/Page13.htm
              Last edited by neilli; 10-20-2006, 06:42 AM.
              Popular is not the same as good
              Rare is not the same as valuable
              Worth is what someone will pay, not what you want to get

              Comment


              • #8
                Yep, I vote for 275 body and fusion neck. Considering the fusion neck was 24 3/4" scale, it should work ok, no?
                My goal in life is to be the kind of asshole my wife thinks I am.

                Comment


                • #9
                  On page 19 of that same catalog is a 24 fret charvel fusion special. It's the same other than the # of frets. Fusion special also has the beveled cutaway that doesn't appear to be on the 275. I am not sure the 275 is 24 3/4 scale, but the fusion special is.
                  When you take a shower in space, you have to press the water onto your body to clean yourself, and then you gotta vacuum it off. - Ace Frehley

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Definitely a Charvel body. No production Jacksons had the forward-angled bridge pickup. 3-single models (like the Warrior Pro) were slanted backwards.
                    I want to depart this world the same way I arrived; screaming and covered in someone else's blood

                    The most human thing we can do is comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable.

                    My Blog: http://newcenstein.com

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      My vote is Charvel body it has no rear scalopping around the neck plate area
                      Really? well screw Mark Twain.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Not all of them did have the neckplate scallop.
                        I want to depart this world the same way I arrived; screaming and covered in someone else's blood

                        The most human thing we can do is comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable.

                        My Blog: http://newcenstein.com

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X