Hi all. The situation is this..
My main guitar is a gibson SG standard. Up until a few weeks ago I didn't think neck-through-body was much of a big deal, and well, I was wrong. I went shopping for a guitar for a friend, he was pretty sure he wanted a jackson, and we tried the SL3 soloist and the neck just blew me away. (He did get the SL3 and it kicks serious ass) I pretty much knew right then my next guitar would have to be neck-through.
I do want a tremolo, although I'd be making fairly light use of it for the most part. I'm not a huge fan from what I've tried, but still, in a way I want one, after all I have a very good hardtail. The neck-through is an absolute must on the other hand. If I was to go with a hardtail, RR5 suits me perfectly, but on the other hand.. if I do want one, I'd have to get the RR1. What I'm asking really is, is it worth that jump to the RR1. Between the RR5 and the RR1, would I REALLY notice a difference in quality? Pretty tempting to just ditch the tremolo and get the RR5. Big money difference. Kinda annoying too, the trem bar gets in my way. I suppose I could get used to it.
Getting a soloist or something else is unfortunately not an option. I'm a huge Randy fan and it'll be sort of a tribute guitar for me [img]graemlins/notworthy.gif[/img] .
What also sucks is all the jackson dealers in my area only carry the low end stuff. The SL3 was the only jackson over $1000 (canadian) we found. I assume I could pretty much trust an RR1 to be top notch without personally testing it. Could I say the same for an RR5?
HALP MEH!! [img]graemlins/images/icons/wink.gif[/img]
Thanks!
My main guitar is a gibson SG standard. Up until a few weeks ago I didn't think neck-through-body was much of a big deal, and well, I was wrong. I went shopping for a guitar for a friend, he was pretty sure he wanted a jackson, and we tried the SL3 soloist and the neck just blew me away. (He did get the SL3 and it kicks serious ass) I pretty much knew right then my next guitar would have to be neck-through.
I do want a tremolo, although I'd be making fairly light use of it for the most part. I'm not a huge fan from what I've tried, but still, in a way I want one, after all I have a very good hardtail. The neck-through is an absolute must on the other hand. If I was to go with a hardtail, RR5 suits me perfectly, but on the other hand.. if I do want one, I'd have to get the RR1. What I'm asking really is, is it worth that jump to the RR1. Between the RR5 and the RR1, would I REALLY notice a difference in quality? Pretty tempting to just ditch the tremolo and get the RR5. Big money difference. Kinda annoying too, the trem bar gets in my way. I suppose I could get used to it.
Getting a soloist or something else is unfortunately not an option. I'm a huge Randy fan and it'll be sort of a tribute guitar for me [img]graemlins/notworthy.gif[/img] .
What also sucks is all the jackson dealers in my area only carry the low end stuff. The SL3 was the only jackson over $1000 (canadian) we found. I assume I could pretty much trust an RR1 to be top notch without personally testing it. Could I say the same for an RR5?
HALP MEH!! [img]graemlins/images/icons/wink.gif[/img]
Thanks!
Comment