Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What new models would you like from Jackson ?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • tonemonster
    replied
    Originally posted by Nagash02 View Post
    SL2HR... what does the R stand for again ?

    I know, I'm a moron ^^
    REVERSE headstock!!!!!!!!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Nagash02
    replied
    SL2HR... what does the R stand for again ?

    I know, I'm a moron ^^

    Leave a comment:


  • tonemonster
    replied
    Seriously, there is certainly enough demand for reverse headstock soloists as standard production USA models. they have been missing that mark for years now. not everyone can afford or is willing to pay custom shop prices for one.

    Leave a comment:


  • MakeAJazzNoiseHere
    replied
    Originally posted by tonemonster View Post
    oh your funny.
    What about his funny? :think:

    I guess that means if Jackson is listening, we should expect to see some RHS Soloists... But not for about a year or so? :dunno:

    Leave a comment:


  • tonemonster
    replied
    oh your funny.

    Leave a comment:


  • wilkinsi
    replied
    Whoa! They haven't even finished buolding YOURS yet. Sheesh!

    Leave a comment:


  • tonemonster
    replied
    they would sell more than 3!

    but they probably wont listen.

    Leave a comment:


  • MakeAJazzNoiseHere
    replied
    An SL2HR would be bad-ass. They'd sell at least three of them!

    Leave a comment:


  • DarkkWarriorr
    replied
    Originally posted by tonemonster View Post
    I want to see standard USA select soloists with REVERSE headstocks.
    +1
    A reverse headstock would definitely make the soloist one nasty badass guitar. Sign me in...

    Leave a comment:


  • tonemonster
    replied
    I want to see standard USA select soloists with REVERSE headstocks.

    and


    the return of "toothpaste" logo charvels like in the early 90's. standard and reversed headstock.

    Leave a comment:


  • algeriet
    replied
    Same headstock size as USA Jacksons
    Maple fretboards on King Vs(c'mon! It would be sweet!)
    AND ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS HAVE FUCKING BINDING!! ARGH!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Total_Annihilation
    replied
    I'd love to see a run of a new version of the JJ. Call it the JJ2011 or something like that, Mahogany Body/Neck. Neck thru body. Neck dimensions the same as the SLSMG. Tune-o-matic bridge w/ string thru body. Duncan pups like the USA models. Ebony board w/ shark fin inlays. Bone or graphite nut. Not sure which hardware color would be best. Volume/tone control with push/pull coil tapping for both the neck and bridge pups. 3 way toggle switch instead of a blade switch. Maybe make the middle selection kill output so the middle becomes a killswitch (mostly preference because I never select both pickups). Or add a separate killswitch so everyone can still select the middle setting and I think you have a pretty versatile instrument that can cover a lot of areas.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nagash02
    replied
    Do you think we could bring someone from Jackson to actually read this thread ?

    Leave a comment:


  • stevieb91
    replied
    How about an MIJ Star, FR and T models.. Bolt on, neck through, whatever, just a more affordable option than ordering through the CS and the apparent nightmares that soon follow... Oh, and put jack the same place it is on the Rhoads, please...

    Leave a comment:


  • DarkkWarriorr
    replied
    - Bring back the Warrior Pro with a reversed headstock as a production model. (Or at least like others have suggested, WR5FR with Binding)
    - A 24 frets/Floyd Rose Les Paul body with a pointy headstock would totally rock.
    - Ditch the JS series all together.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X