Is it Ok to put a OFR on a Jackson that was originally fitted with a Schaller???

[danolikestoscoot]

assuming the routing fits. as far as intonation and anything else goes, will it work perfectly? or is it going to mess everything up?

also i'm wondering if the mounting of it will mess anything up...

[ralph]

You may have trouble with intonation, depending on the tuning you use, but this is not always a problem

however the biggest problem is that the floyd locking bolts are longer than the schaller JT-590, so if the guitar has a trem route for the JT-590 the floyd locking bolts may hit on the edge of the rout as it is smaller. If non-recessed then this is not a problem

[Ward]

Here's a link that has a comprehensive list of potential problems with OFR swaps.

http://audiozone.dk/index-filer/Trem...htm#intonation

The site is run by a member here and is fantastic.

[danolikestoscoot]

hey ralph thanks for your reply :]

it's recessed but the locking bolts are okay, they dont extend over.

my main concern is tuning/intonation issues.
i would have it tuned to either E or D standard.

if i buy this guitar i just want to make sure that the OFR isn't sacrificing the quality of the instrument.

90's jackson

[danolikestoscoot]

Here's a link that has a comprehensive list of potential problems with OFR swaps.

http://audiozone.dk/index-filer/Trem...htm#intonation

The site is run by a member here and is fantastic.

that was a good read thanks ward.

so in your guys opinion; with my preferences of tuning would you hesitate to buy a jackson that had been updated with an OFR instead of it's schaller? would that be a detterent? or is it totally fine? thanks

[moku]

intonation should be fine with minor adjustments. no problem. ask away if you need help intonating the guitar.
ofr were made by schaller!

[coloradoman25]

I have a Schaller if you need to swap id trade ya its about dead mint black I believe it is a charvel logo'd one. I have a bunch of OFR's kickin around already but whats one more lol

Good luck!

[danolikestoscoot]

well i heard that after putting in an ofr the post holes are enlarged so you cant switch back to a schaller

[rjohnstone]

well i heard that after putting in an ofr the post holes are enlarged so you cant switch back to a schaller

You don't have to swap the posts. The Schaller posts work just fine with an OFR.

[DonP]

that was a good read thanks ward.

so in your guys opinion; with my preferences of tuning would you hesitate to buy a jackson that had been updated with an OFR instead of it's schaller? would that be a detterent? or is it totally fine? thanks

I wouldn't be worried, but I'd try to get the correct Jackson labeled Schaller trem (should be cheaper than the OFR). You could either sell the OFR if you need the $$'s or keep it for another project.

[danolikestoscoot]

You don't have to swap the posts. The Schaller posts work just fine with an OFR.

ya i'm actually just wondering about buying a guitar that orginallly came with a schaller but now has a floyd installed, so i was worried of enlarged holes in the body from someone installing OFR posts

[moku]

if you see that the post holes are messed up, and don't want to deal with it, then don't buy it. or just ask the seller if he had installed new floyd posts!
post pics if you can--that would answer a lot of questions. otherwise, our posts would just go back and forth endlessly cuz we're in the dark of what your considering to buy.

[ginsambo]

Read the article. How strange. I got a KNE Pacer body that must of been routed for a OFR then as I measured the scale length and the cheapy neck I bought was 1/16" too long at the heel with the Schaller maxed out - exactly!

Being cheap, I thought it was the neck, not the posts, the posts being 1/16" out never occurred to me. So, being a cheapy neck, I free hand routed the end of the neck heel. Actually, with the depth stop set on the router and the projecting fingerboard unscathed it turned out a better fit than it was originally, really tight and a good job in the end.

I don't have a recessed trem route, but a problem I'm having is the trem arm collar fouling on the trem rout cavity. Does the Schaller trem arm collar, under the trem, project out sideways more into the cavity than a OFR? Or is it just a template problem?

[rjohnstone]

I don't have a recessed trem route, but a problem I'm having is the trem arm collar fouling on the trem rout cavity. Does the Schaller trem arm collar, under the trem, project out sideways more into the cavity than a OFR? Or is it just a template problem?

They both use the same trem arm and socket.
Sounds like your template may have been off a touch.

[ginsambo]

They both use the same trem arm and socket.
Sounds like your template may have been off a touch.

Yeah, think I'II file the rout out a bit, its only half a mm or so, if that. Although looking at my Jt580 takeuchi, the trem arm appears to be slightly closer to the high E saddle, and that has a smaller top collar, so probably a mm closer or so. Haven't got a OFR to compare.

Anyway nothing a file and some cheap black paint won't sort out..